# Discrepancy in Cura Profile temps

**URL:** <https://forum.lulzbot.com/t/discrepancy-in-cura-profile-temps/4650>\
**Category:** LulzBot Mini\
**Created:** [March 7, 2017, 2:08am UTC](https://forum.lulzbot.com/t/discrepancy-in-cura-profile-temps/4650 "2017-03-07T02:08:39Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![daggius](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/7feea3/32.png) [@daggius](https://forum.lulzbot.com/u/daggius)\
**Post date:** [March 7, 2017, 2:08am UTC](https://forum.lulzbot.com/t/discrepancy-in-cura-profile-temps/4650/1 "2017-03-07T02:08:39Z")

</div>

[https://www.lulzbot.com/mini-cura-profiles](https://www.lulzbot.com/mini-cura-profiles)

Most of the profiles on this page say one temp, For example Allow 910 says 235 C, but when you click the profile it actually says 250 C inside the profile.

15C is a pretty big difference, What is actually recommended? The text on the webpage or the text in the profiles?

Thanks

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ScottW](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/53a042/32.png) [@ScottW](https://forum.lulzbot.com/u/ScottW)\
**Post date:** [March 7, 2017, 8:47pm UTC](https://forum.lulzbot.com/t/discrepancy-in-cura-profile-temps/4650/2 "2017-03-07T20:47:37Z")

</div>

Taulman’s web site recommends 250-255 for Alloy910. I use 250 with good results.

Based on those two data points, I’d say Lulzbot’s Cura profile is correct (250C) and the accompanying text on their web site needs an update.